landscape architect design methods _2

 landscape architect design methods

Polk defines the following key terms.

    Observe: To gather information and evidence; to discover or determine the existence, presence, or
fact of. In this stage the designer observes him or herself, the site and its surrounding, and the designs objective.
     Orient: To construct a mental model that allows the designer to understand the reality of the present situation and the desired state. In this stage, the designer is able to understand the present state and visualize in what direction or directions--either narrowly or broadly defined-- the design should move. It must be noted that Boyd stresses the importance of creating a new reality during this stage of the design loop. The designer must avoid using the familiar

       paradigms that do not reflect the current real- ity.  Before the designer brings together linked elements of the observation, he or she must destruct the existing whole, break it into it elements, and then create a new perspective of reality by constructing from the specific to the general. The intent is best captured by Polk:


“(Destruction of a domain or breaking the whole into its respective constituent elements) before he” (in this case the designer) “can collect linking elements to recreate a new and improved observation creation of a new perceptions of reality through specific to general induction, synthesis, and integration of common qualities or attributes found in the chaotic world.” (Polk, 19)

In this case, the chaotic world is the design. So one destroys the observed or starting reality so that the influences perceived or real of the starting reality are reduced.
 landscape architect design methods
         Decide: To make choices of how to reach the desired state. This involves the selection of methodologies and course of action.
    Act: To implement the decision. (Polk, 16-21)

Returning to Rowe. Rowe classifies his methods into five branches of heuristic reasoning.

“Five classes of heuristics can be identified largely according to the kind of subject matter
involved. They are:
1) the use of anthropocentric analogies, 
2) the use of literal analogies, 
3) the use of environmental relations, 
4) the use of typologies, 
5) the use of formal “languages”. 

 These classes were based on protocol analysis of architectural designers at work, mixed with some speculation. Each class is by no means exclusive of the characteristics of others, nor totally inclusive of the range of possible heuristics. Rather, the classification is one of practical convenience for grouping and discussing observations.” (Rowe, 18)

Comments