![]() |
Building Information Modeling (BIM) |
The impact of BIM on the AECO industry. Thoughtful and objective criticism of BIM is helpful and necessary to counter vendor marketing overreach and fan boy zealotry. Unfortunately the criticisms I
read are neither thoughtful nor objective. Instead they rely on sensationalist titles, sources outside of the building industry, and nonexistent relationships between cause-and-effect.
BIM is Easy
Many of those who think BIM modeling is easy to put into practice in a design or construction office have been blinded by the hype of clever marketing. The truth is, that other than standard (and colorful) objects like columns, beams, and simple gridlines, the real work of documenting a building’s construction is either quietly ignored or passed on to some unwitting subcontractor as part of a bid proposal.BIM adoption affects productivity
Like any change adoption, switching to BIM may cause some productivity losses during the initial implementation phase. Contrary to common misconception, however, BIM adoption does not incur any long-term productivity losses. In fact, effective BIM implementation enables a company to improve their long-term productivity, as well as maximize return on investment (RoI).BIM is expensive
Another myth about BIM is that this technology is very expensive. It is true that the upfront cost required for BIM adoption is somewhat higher than that of the traditional construction process. However, several BIM benefits can make up for that loss fairly quickly.BIM benefits the owner only
Some construction professionals believe that BIM benefits are limited to owners. In other words, they claim that BIM implementation does not benefit engineers, contractors, designers, and others associated with the construction project. This is another big misconception. Contrary to this, the effective use of BIM helps all team members derive several benefits, including getting an income hike.
BIM is not one software
BIM software
Comments
Post a Comment