Architect Notebook .... A WORKING METHOD

TRADITION v. THE VIRTUAL BUILDING

TRADITION v. THE VIRTUAL BUILDING

 

Our primary concerns have been those aspects of a design programer which most profoundly influence the ‘form-making’ process in the prosecution of a building design. But having established a ‘form’ which meets the major design objectives and is capable of development, this process represents in time but a fraction of the entire protracted design period.

Nevertheless, it represents by far the most crucial (and arguably, the most problematic) activity for the designer; flawed decisions in form-making cannot be retrieved by subsequent assiduous attention to detail but only appropriate formal responses at this stage can form the basis of meaningful architecture. Moreover, they can be developed to enhance the clarity of that initial concept.

  • Design by drawing

Nevertheless, it is axiomatic that a facility for drawing most emphatically assists the design process; ‘design by drawing’, then, represents by far the most accessible and efficient method for early exploration in design.




Design by drawing
Moreover, overlays of tracing paper, because of their transparency, allow swift modification of an initial ‘form’ again and again without having to repeat the whole process from scratch; the results of this process can then be assessed by means of a physical model. Even at this stage, colored pencils can be used, ‘coding’ drawings to distinguish spatial hierarchies. Such clarity will help not only the ongoing assessment of the emerging design’s validity, but will also assist in maintaining the clarity of the diagram as the design develops. 

Designs cannot be ‘tested’ until they are drawn to scale. Only in this way can the designer ‘feel’ the size of building elements in relation to each other and in relation to the site and its physical context.

  • The virtual building


Although it is now unthinkable that fledgling architects could enter their profession without sophisticated levels of computer literacy, nevertheless, there is still a perception amongst many that hand drawing and physical models offer a more direct and flexible design tool than computer-generated techniques. 

But if the central role of the architect is to create spaces for human habitation, then it seems axiomatic that the virtual building, which provides an accurate three-dimensional representation of the designer’s concept, will allow him to understand the project more comprehensively. 


the virtual building
Essentially, the virtual building is an accurately described digital representation of an architectural design modeled three-dimensionally. As the project develops, the virtual building allows the architect to accurately ‘test’ the three-dimensional outcomes of design decisions that affect the nature of external form, internal space, and junctions of components.





Moreover, because it is represented by one model, then the need to co-ordinate several drawings is removed, and the margin 108 Architecture: Design Notebook for error, inherent in traditional methods, is therefore substantially reduced. Two-dimensional plans, sections and elevations may also be extracted for evaluation early in the design process, with any modifications subsequently being fed back into the single virtual building model.

Comments