Figure-ground theory is borrowed from psychology. You see either the figure (black) or the ground (white). In architecture, the buildings are the figure, the open spaces, streets, and courtyards are the ground.
Most students obsess over the figure - the shape of their building. Masters obsess over the ground - the shape of the space between buildings. Look at the famous Nolli map of Rome from 1748. He drew buildings as black poché and public space as white. What you see is that the white space is beautifully shaped. The piazzas are rooms. The streets are corridors. Rome is not a collection of buildings, it is a collection of shaped voids.
Frederick teaches: Design the void first. If you design a building without designing the space around it, you are creating leftover space, not place. A good project shapes both.
This applies at every scale. At city scale, figure-ground shows if a city is dense or sprawl. At site scale, it shows if your building creates a good courtyard or a dark corridor. At plan scale, it shows if your furniture arrangement creates good negative space for circulation.
For Egyptian projects like New Alamein or administrative capital, the biggest failure is not bad buildings, it is unshaped ground. Huge empty spaces between towers that no one uses. That's because architects drew buildings, not figure-ground.
The exercise: Take your plan and fill all built areas in black with a marker. Now look only at the white. Is the white beautiful? Is it usable? Is it varied? If the white is just leftover thin strips, your design failed. Redesign until the white is as beautiful as the black. When you master figure-ground, you stop being a building designer and start being a city designer.
Comments
Post a Comment