Architecture's biggest debate in one line: Mies van der Rohe said "Less is More". Robert Venturi replied "Less is a Bore".
Who is right? Both. It depends on purpose.
Less is More works when material is beautiful, detail is perfect, proportion is divine. Think Apple Store, Farnsworth House, Japanese house. Every line matters because there are few lines. Mistake tolerance zero. If you do less, you must do it perfectly.
Less is a Bore works when context is complex, culture is rich, people want story, ornament, color. Think Islamic architecture, downtown Cairo balconies, Hassan Fathy villages. More layers, more shadow, more pattern = more delight.
Frederick says: Know which game you are playing. If your client has low budget and poor workmanship, don't play Less is More, because poor workmanship with less looks just poor. Play More - add texture, pattern, color to hide imperfections.
In Egypt, Less is More often fails in execution because less needs perfect plaster, perfect paint, perfect alignment. Egyptian site often has imperfect. So smart architects in Egypt play controlled More: add wooden screens, brick patterns, local stone texture that forgives imperfections and adds richness.
For your LinkedIn, this article is great for engagement because you ask audience: Team Mies or Team Venturi? Architects love to argue. Post two images: minimalist villa vs richly detailed villa, ask which they prefer and why.
The thinking lesson: Architecture is not style choice. It's strategic choice based on budget, skill, context, and client personality. Master both less and more, and you can handle any project.
Want me to design the last 5 carousel posts for Architectural Thinking Part 4?
Comments
Post a Comment